coolskelebones420

coolskelebones420:

Driving skele: the skele who just wants to fit in with the cr5w and is hella happy to do menial tasks as long as he gets to take part in the shenanigans

Passenger skele: the girlfriend who got too deep into the action. She’s having fun but hoping the other skeles will take care of her and she pretends to have more fun than she’s really having so no one suspects that she’s afraid

Skele with scythe: the crazy ass mofo who’ll go along with any plan and probably take it too far. He’s out to fucking get your ass with his scythe he’ll grim reaper you be careful

Middle skele: the skele doing it for his crazy friend Jim, Jim was a goddamn maniac but now all that’s left of him is a skull that the middle skele brings with him everywhere. Middle skele gets up to ALL KINDS of shenanigans and justifies them as “it’s what jim would have wanted”

Jim: the skull. all that’s left after a tragic accident where one skele went harder than any skele has gone before. He doesn’t speak anymore but he’s still always where the action is thanks to middle skele.

Spooky skele: the spookiest skele. He goes where the cr5w goes, always ready to deliver the spooks. spooky skele could scare the bones off of a skele he’s so spooky. goddamn. look at him. 

c-a-bergamot

c-a-bergamot:

jaclcfrost:

do u ever have a thought that’s so fuckin inappropriate that u feel like dumping a bucket of water on urself like. calm down, self. tone it down. think about jesus

Sometimes I’m scared of what I think…

Sometimes I realize what I’m capable of with a little planning and it’s horrible and it makes me go play video games for three weeks because I don’t want to apply myself at all. 

objectivistnerd

Anonymous asked:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need?

naughtyconservative answered:

Don’t make me puke.

objectivistnerd:

the-benaissance-man:

objectivistnerd:

the-benaissance-man:

objectivistnerd:

the-benaissance-man:

objectivistnerd:

realitychemist:

iauiugu:

I don’t see how this phrase is necessarily incompatible with libertarianism

It advocates redistribution of wealth through taxation.

The strange thing is, if interpreted as voluntary trade, then it’s actually quite capitalist.

nah, capitalism is more along the lines of “to each according to his ability, from each according to his need”.

I didn’t know you were a communist, Ben.

I did word that incorrectly, didn’t I?  I’m kind of out of it right now. 

Changing “from” to “for” makes all the difference

stiiiillll not seeing it.

You’re rewarded in accordance to what you produce, and then trade to supply yourself with what you don’t produce.

Not really in line with anarcho-arktism but it works.

Yeah, and isn’t that what I said?

And of course, but that’s not really what we were talking about, was it?

objectivistnerd

Anonymous asked:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need?

naughtyconservative answered:

Don’t make me puke.

objectivistnerd:

the-benaissance-man:

objectivistnerd:

the-benaissance-man:

objectivistnerd:

realitychemist:

iauiugu:

I don’t see how this phrase is necessarily incompatible with libertarianism

It advocates redistribution of wealth through taxation.

The strange thing is, if interpreted as voluntary trade, then it’s actually quite capitalist.

nah, capitalism is more along the lines of “to each according to his ability, from each according to his need”.

I didn’t know you were a communist, Ben.

I did word that incorrectly, didn’t I?  I’m kind of out of it right now. 

Changing “from” to “for” makes all the difference

stiiiillll not seeing it.